Comments Due Soon! NIGC Announces Proposed Rule Amending 25 C.F.R. Part 517 Regulations Implementing the Freedom of Information Act of 1966

NIGA Member Tribes

Chairman Ernest L. Stevens Jr.
Jason C. Giles, Executive Director
Danielle Her Many Horses, Deputy Executive Director/General Counsel

Comments Due Soon! NIGC Announces Proposed Rule Amending 25 C.F.R. Part 517 Regulations Implementing the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 

November 15, 2017





On October 17, 2017, the National Indian Gaming Commission ("NIGC") issued a Proposed Rule to amend the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") procedures contained in 25 C.F.R. Part 517 ("Part 517"). Comments are due to the NIGC by November 16, 2017.  A copy of the Proposed Rule is available at the following link:

We encourage you to submit written comments on the Proposed Rule, which represents the first substantive revision of Part 517 since 2006. Many of the proposed revisions track the changes made to FOIA since 2006 and are thus required by law. Other changes, according to the preamble of the Proposed Rule, "are being done to improve [the NIGC's] FOIA process." 

The NIGC did not consult with tribal governments in developing this Proposed Rule as it did not believe that any of the proposed revisions warranted prior tribal consultation. However, the Proposed Rule contains at least one major change that warrants the attention of the NIGA community. Specifically, the NIGC is seeking to remove the term "record" from the definitions section in 25 C.F.R. § 517.4(h). This definition, however, is critical to understanding and interpreting the NIGC's FOIA process.  

Enclosed is a model comment letter to assist you in preparing your comments on these and other proposed changes to 25 C.F.R. Part 517. Written comments may be submitted on or beforeNovember 16, 2017,by any of the methods below:

·     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
·     Email:
·     Fax: 202-632-7066.
·     U.S. Mail: National Indian Gaming Commission, 1849 C Street NW., MS 1621, Washington, DC 20240.
·     Hand Delivery: National Indian Gaming Commission, 90 K Street NE., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20002, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Please contact Danielle Her Many Horses at 202-546-7711 or by email at if you have any questions or concerns regarding this Alert.  


November XX, 2017

Mr. Jonodev Chaudhuri, Chairman
National Indian Gaming Commission
1849 C Street NW
Mailstop #1621
Washington, DC 20240

Re: Comments on October 17, 2017 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Amending FOIA Procedures in 25 C.F.R. § 517

Dear Chairman Chaudhuri:

On behalf of the ____Tribe/Nation/Pueblo, we hereby submit the following comments on the National Indian Gaming Commission's ("NIGC") Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("Proposed Rule") issued on October 17, 2017[1] containing proposed amendments to 25 C.F.R. Part 517 ("Part 517"), Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") procedures for the NIGC. The United States Congress has amended FOIA twice since the last comprehensive revisions to Part 517 on April 19, 2006.[2] We are pleased that the NIGC is now willing to take up the important task of updating Part 517 to reflect the latest amendments to FOIA, and we applaud the NIGC's efforts to bring greater clarity and transparency to the FOIA process.

While we generally support the NIGC's efforts to streamline FOIA processing, we are deeply concerned with the proposal to remove the term "record" from the definitions section of the regulation. It is unclear to us whether this action was due to an oversight or an intentional omission since the Proposed Rule does not provide any explanation for this proposed change.

Nonetheless, we find the proposed removal of such a critical definition to be deeply troubling. The term is not only used repeatedly throughout Part 517, but is the very term that describes what is being sought in a FOIA request. The term, is, therefore, essential to understanding and interpreting the NIGC's FOIA process. We note that under FOIA, agencies are given the discretion to develop their own definitions of "record," and that most agencies, including the U.S. Department of the Interior,[3] have adopted specific definitions of "record" in their FOIA procedures. 

We believe the NIGC's current definition of "record" in 25 C.F.R. § 517.3(h) appropriately describes the scope of materials accessible via a FOIA request to the NIGC. We, therefore, urge the NIGC to retain the existing definition of "record" in order to ensure that the final rule properly defines the scope of information that will be subject to the FOIA processes contained therein.

In closing, we would like to thank you for this opportunity to share our views and comments on the proposed changes reflected in the Proposed Rule for Part 517. We respectfully seek your favorable consideration of our comments and ask that you carefully consider our views and concerns as you move through the rulemaking process.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can provide any additional information. 

Tribal Official

[1] Freedom of Information Act Procedures, 82 Fed. Reg. 48205 (Oct. 17, 2017).
[2] Freedom of Information Act Procedures, 71 Fed. Reg. 20006 (Apr. 19, 2006).
[3] 43 C.F.R. § 2.70 (2016).